• Published February 26, 2016
  • 3 Minute Read
WHITE PAPER

Comparing Leadership Challenges: Civil Service vs. Private Sector

Published February 26, 2016
Comparing Leadership Challenges: Civil Service vs. Private Sector

Introduction

On October 1, 2013, the United States federal government shut down after Congress failed to enact legislation appropriating funds for the new fiscal year.

Routine operations were curtailed, 800,000 federal employees were indefinitely furloughed, and another 1.3 million were required to report to work without known compensation. Regular government services did not resume until October 17 when Congress passed and the president signed an interim appropriations bill.

The government shutdown provided a dramatic example of the clash and collision of views surrounding the role of government and governance, of civil service vs. the private sector.

Political leaders grappled with fundamental questions concerning the core functions, size, and funding of government. Despite their often diametrically opposed views, however, consistent calls could be heard from both sides of the political aisle that “the government should be run more like a business.”

Implicit in this refrain is the assumption that private sector is more efficient or effective than civil service. But are we comparing apples to oranges?

Certainly similarities exist between the public and private sectors. For example, both are populated with organizations of diverse sizes, budgets, and missions.

Nonetheless, major differences are readily apparent. Private sector organizations usually focus on profits and shareholder value, and operate within a business or entrepreneurial framework. Public sector organizations typically focus on regulatory implementation of legislation and service delivery to citizens, and operate within a unique constitutional framework founded upon the separation of powers of the branches of government.

Whether one sector is more or less efficient than another is best left to economists and politicians to deliberate, but the larger question comparing the public to the private sector does raise important issues about the nature of leadership. Are there different challenges associated with leadership in the public vs. private sector?

If so, do those differences alter the skills and behaviors required for good leadership? How might those differences impact leader development? Answering these questions might benefit leaders in both sectors.

This is the second in a series of white papers that compare leadership challenges among military, civil service, and private sector leaders. The first paper compares military vs. civil service, the second examines civil service vs. private sector, and the third looks at military vs. private sector.

We routinely ask participants in our Leadership Development Program (LDP)®, targeted to leaders of managers, and Leadership at the Peak program, targeted to enterprise leaders, to name their 3 most important leadership challenges.

While the results are only applicable to U.S. federal civilian leadership, we feel that these experiences might also be familiar to state and local government leaders.

This data provides rich insights into the similarities and differences between leadership in the public vs. private sector and of challenges faced by those leading in the civil service vs. private industry.

Additional Contributing Author:

Mike Rybacki is a US Army Infantry Major serving as a leadership and management instructor in the Department of Behavioral Science and Leadership, US Military Academy at West Point. Mike served as an infantry platoon leader in the 82nd Airborne Division and an infantry company commander in the 3rd Infantry Division, leading both a platoon in Afghanistan and a company in Iraq. He earned an MBA from Duke University and a BS in systems engineering from the US Military Academy.

Download White Paper

Download White Paper

Understand civil service vs. private sector challenges and how leaders are responding to them by downloading this paper.

  • Published February 26, 2016
  • 3 Minute Read

Written by

Peter Ronayne
Peter Ronayne, PhD
Senior Faculty

Peter designs and delivers open-enrollment and custom programs with a focus on public sector leadership and organizational development. Prior to joining us, he was a dean and senior faculty member at the Federal Executive Institute (FEI) in Charlottesville, VA, where he directed the flagship Leadership for a Democratic Society program and cofounded the institute’s program on neuroscience and leadership. He’s the co-author of The Toxic Boss Survival Guide: Tactics for Navigating the Wilderness at Work.

Peter designs and delivers open-enrollment and custom programs with a focus on public sector leadership and organizational development. Prior to joining us, he was a dean and senior faculty member at the Federal Executive Institute (FEI) in Charlottesville, VA, where he directed the flagship Leadership for a Democratic Society program and cofounded the institute’s program on neuroscience and leadership. He’s the co-author of The Toxic Boss Survival Guide: Tactics for Navigating the Wilderness at Work.

John Ferguson
John Ferguson, MBA
Former Managing Director

John combined his strategy consulting and leadership application experience with C-suite clients to assess, design, and deliver solutions that achieve strategic results. He also coached executives and senior teams to enhance their individual and group performance. Before joining us, John spent over 20 years in military, government, higher education, and corporate leadership positions while living and working in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Germany, Korea, the Philippines, and the United States.  

John combined his strategy consulting and leadership application experience with C-suite clients to assess, design, and deliver solutions that achieve strategic results. He also coached executives and senior teams to enhance their individual and group performance. Before joining us, John spent over 20 years in military, government, higher education, and corporate leadership positions while living and working in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Germany, Korea, the Philippines, and the United States.  

What to Explore Next

White Paper
Comparing Leadership Challenges: Military vs. Civil Service

Download this white paper to understand similarities and differences in common leadership challenges faced by military vs. civil service leaders.

Webinar
Government Leadership After Crisis: Resetting Your Mindset and Expanding Your Tool Set

This webinar will uncover the mindset, tool set, and skill set necessary for leaders in government to maintain the safety of their employees while continuing their vital missions.

Leading Effectively Article
Today’s Top Leadership Tensions & How to Address Them

By understanding the 3 key leadership tensions that today’s managers are grappling with, your organization can help address them, improving retention and overall performance.

Leading Effectively Article
The 4 Essential Leadership Roles of Every Career Journey

In every career journey, you’ll need to be able to play each of these 4 leadership roles from time to time. The key comes in your ability to select the right leadership role for any given situation, to play it well, and to shift between roles as appropriate.

Leading Effectively Article
Your First-Line Managers Need These Critical Frontline Leadership Skills

First-line managers are likely your largest population of leaders. Have you helped them develop the key frontline leadership skills they need to succeed?

Related Solutions

CCL Regional Headquarters

AMERICAS

+1 336 545 2810
ccl.org

EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST, AFRICA

+32 (0) 2 679 09 10
ccl.org/emea

ASIA-PACIFIC, INDIA, GREATER CHINA

+65 6854 6000
ccl.org/apac

About CCL

At the Center for Creative Leadership, our drive to create a ripple effect of positive change underpins everything we do. For 50+ years, we've pioneered leadership development solutions for everyone from frontline workers to global CEOs. Consistently ranked among the world's top providers of executive education, our research-based programs and solutions inspire individuals in organizations across the world — including 2/3 of the Fortune 1000 — to ignite remarkable transformations.